Capital gains tax (CGT) in the context of the Australian taxation system applies to the capital gain made on disposal of any asset, except for specific exemptions. The most significant exemption is the family home. Rollover provisions apply to some disposals, one of the most significant is transfers to beneficiaries on death, so that the CGT is not a quasi death duty.
CGT operates by having net gains treated as taxable income in the tax year an asset is sold or otherwise disposed of. If an asset is held for at least 1 year then any gain is first discounted by 50% for individual taxpayers, or by 33.3% for superannuation funds. Net losses in a tax year may be carried forward, but not offset against income.
Personal use assets and collectables are treated as separate categories and losses on those are quarantined so they can only be applied against gains in the same category, not other gains. This works to stop taxpayers subsidising hobbies from their investment earnings.
Capital gains tax was introduced in Australia on 20th September 1985, one of a number of tax reforms by the Hawke/Keating government. The tax applies only to assets acquired on or after that date. Gains (or losses) on earlier assets, called pre-CGT assets are ignored.
The rules introduced initially allowed the cost of assets held for 1 year to be indexed by the consumer price index (CPI) before calculating a gain (calculation of a loss used only the unindexed cost though). This meant the part of a price rise due only to inflation was not taxed. This rule was only current between 1985 and 1999 when it was then frozen.
Also, initially an averaging process was used to calculate the tax on gains. 20% of one's net capital gain was included as income, and the amount of extra tax it caused was multiplied by 5. So instead of a big capital gain pushing the taxpayer into higher tax brackets immediately, the brackets were stretched out, allowing more to be taxed at one's existing marginal rate.
From 20 September 1999 indexing of the cost base was discontinued, and instead the present 50% discount on the plain gain above the cost base was introduced. For assets acquired before that date the taxpayer can choose between indexing (up to the CPI at 30 September 1999) or discount.
Also from 21 September 1999, small business CGT concessions were introduced (below), reducing tax on small business owners retiring, and on active assets being sold, and allowing a rollover when selling one active asset to buy another
The law is framed so as to apply to all assets, except those specifically exempted. It applies both to assets owned outright and to a partial interest in an asset, and to both tangible and intangible assets. The current exemptions are, in approximate order of significance,
Trading stock is not regarded as an asset and instead comes under ordinary income tax. Items of plant being depreciated are subject to CGT, but only in the unusual case that they're sold for more than original cost (see Depreciating assets below)
The capital gains tax law is expressed in terms of a set of 52 CGT events (see ITAA 1997 section 104-5). Each event specifies results such as gain, loss, or cost base adjustment are to be made, and how to determine the date to use for the transaction.
The most common event is A1, the disposal of an asset. On disposal a capital gain arises if the proceeds are greater than the cost base, a capital loss arises if less than the reduced cost base. The date to be used is the date of the contract of sale (even if payment is not until later), or if no such contract exists then the date the taxpayer stopped being the owner (e.g. if an asset is lost).
The cost base of an asset is the amount paid for it, including associated costs such as agent's commissions. But there are three forms, from lowest to highest amount,
On disposal then,
Capital gains and losses in a given tax year are totalled, but in three separate categories according to the class of the asset,
The existence of separate categories for collectables and personal items works to prevent losses from them being offset against other gains such as from investments. In effect it prevents hobbies being subsidised.
Net losses in each category can be carried forward to future years, in their respective categories, but can't be offset ordinary income, or each other.
Also note that Capital Losses are applied before the Capital Gains discount. (e.g. An individual makes a Capital Gain of $100 eligible for discount x 50%= $50 Net Capital Gain. If the person also had Capital Losses of $50, the losses would apply first then there would be $50 Capital Gains leftover eligible for discount x 50% to $25 Net capital Gain)
The most common difference between cost base and reduced cost base are non tax deductible costs associated with maintaining ownership of the asset. For example the cost of defending one's title to a non income producing asset. Such costs are added to the cost base (having the effect of reducing a subsequent capital gain), but are not be added to the reduced cost base (and therefore don't give the benefit of a greater capital loss).
Prior to 1 July 2001, distributions from property trusts commonly included a so-called "tax free" portion which was subtracted from the reduced cost base but not the cost base, in a similar way. (See Property trust distributions below.)
For assets acquired before 20 September 1999 the taxpayer may choose between two methods of calculating a capital gain. Either the discount method described above, or the indexation method,
The taxpayer can use whichever method results in the least tax.
As capital losses are applied before the Capital Gains discount - Those with capital losses (in the same or previous years)with a few different share sales using the Indexation method can result in a better outcome.
For example: Individual with Capital Losses of $4,000
With only Capital Gains - the discount method is usually better (note Indexation is better for small (perhaps only very small) gains). The choice is essentially between reducing one's gain by the CPI rise of the cost base, or halving it outright. The CPI indexing may be small, but if one's proceeds are below it then there's no tax. When the gain gets above twice what indexation can knock off then the discount method is better.
The following are matters relating to specific asset classes.
A gift made by a living person is treated as a disposal at current market value. The giver is taxed for a disposal at that price, the receiver gets that as their cost base.
Testamentary gifts, i.e. made upon death under a will or under the laws of intestacy, are instead subject to rollover provisions in most cases (see Death below).
When a shareholder is called to pay a further installment on part-paid shares, the amount paid is added to the cost base and reduced cost base. The date of acquisition of the shares remains unchanged.
When a company splits its shares, for instance 2 shares for every 1 previously held there's no immediate CGT effect. The taxpayer's date of acquisition and cost base for the holding are unchanged, only it's for the new number of shares. Likewise for a consolidation (reverse split).
Bonus shares issued by a company from its share capital account are treated the same as splits (above), they only change the number of shares in the holding. However there are complicated rules to apply when bonus shares are offered in lieu of dividends, or when they're part-paid shares.
Bonus units from a unit trust are similar to bonus shares. Fully paid units with no amount to include in one's accessible income (as advised by the trust), merely change the number of shares in one's holding, otherwise a set of rules apply.
Various companies offer dividend reinvestment plans whereby a shareholder can elect to receive newly issued shares instead of a dividend, often at a small discount to the prevailing market price.
Such a plan is treated as if the shareholder received the dividend and then used the money to buy shares. The dividend is taxed like any other dividend (including with any dividend imputation), and the shares are taken to be acquired for the cash one didn't receive.
Incidentally, record-keeping for dividend reinvestment plans can be annoying for the shareholder, because it creates lots of little parcels of shares with different acquisition dates and costs.
When different parcels of shares (etc.) have been acquired at different times or for different prices, it's necessary to identify which ones are disposed of in a sale, since the capital gain or loss may be different for each.
If share certificates or similar are used then clearly the ones transferred are the parcel. But when shares are held aggregated in bank account style such as in the CHESS system used by the Australian Stock Exchange, then the taxpayer can nominate which of the original purchases it is that are sold.
In both cases the taxpayer can choose to their advantage, such as selling a parcel with a capital loss to realize that immediately, or keeping particular parcels until they reach 1 year old to get the 50% discount on gains.
A further option is available for parcels of the same shares acquired all on one day. If desired they can be aggregated to make one parcel with the total of the costs, i.e. averaging out the prices paid. This reduces paperwork if for example shares are bought at a range of prices through the course of a day.
Some listed companies are set up so that their securities are "stapled" together. For example each unit of the Westfield Group is three parts, a share in Westfield Limited, a unit in the Westfield Australia Trust, and a unit in the Westfield America Trust.
Taxpayers treat each part of a stapled security separately for capital gains tax purposes, i.e. calculate a gain or loss on each separately. But since stapled securities trade with only a price for the bundle, the taxpayer must use some "reasonable" method for apportioning the price across the parts. The Westfield Group for example recommends on their securities using the ratios of the net tangible asset backing (NTA) of each part.
A building allowance of 2.5% (or 4% in certain cases) of the original construction cost of a building is allowed as a deduction against income each year (until the original cost is exhausted). The amounts claimed as a deduction are subtracted from the cost base and reduced cost base of the building. (Note the allowance is calculated on the original construction cost, not a price later paid, and note also a building is a separate CGT asset from the land it stands on, and only the building cost base is affected.)
Building allowance works as a kind of depreciation, representing progressive decline over the lifetime of a building. But unlike the way depreciation has a final balancing adjustment against income, the building allowance instead gets that as capital gain (or loss) through it lowering the cost base.
As an example, if it's assuming a building is worth nothing at the end of the 40 years implied by the 2.5% a year allowance, the owner has had deductions progressively over those years instead of only realizing the whole lot in one big capital loss at the end.
Distributions from property trusts (both listed and unlisted) commonly include two amounts which affect capital gains tax,
The investor subtracts the tax deferred part of a distribution from their cost base (and reduced cost base). It's called tax deferred because the investor pays no tax on the amount immediately, but will pay capital gains tax on it when they later sell the units, because it's lowered their cost base.
Tax deferred amounts generally arise from building allowances, the same as for direct property ownership (see above). At its simplest it works as follows. Suppose a trust earns rental income of $100 and has building allowance deductions of $20. Then the net taxable income is $80 and that amount is distributed to unitholders to be included in their income. The remaining $20 of cash is distributed to the unitholders too, but it's regarded as a return of capital.
An investor's cost base cannot go below zero. If tax deferred amounts have reduced it to zero, then any excess must be declared as a capital gain in the year received. This is an unusual situation, generally it can't occur unless an investor has been able to get trust units for much less than the value of the buildings.
Capital gains distributed by a trust arise from the trust selling assets. They're taxed in the investor's hands the same as other gains. When there's a choice of discount or indexation method, the trust manager makes that choice.
Discount capital gains are distributed in already discounted form, i.e. already reduced by 50% for assets held at least 1 year. The investor must gross it up by doubling, apply any capital losses, then re-discount the remainder. (If one has no capital losses to apply then there's no change and the amount received is the amount taxed.)
For the option holder, i.e. the taker,
For the option writer, i.e. grantor,
Rights or options issued by the company allowing existing shareholders to buy new shares are treated as being acquired for nil cost at the same time as the shares were acquired. If sold then the proceeds are a capital gain (or not a capital gain if those shares were pre-CGT).
If the rights are exercised then the new shares are taken to be acquired for the amount paid and on the date exercised. If the shares were pre-CGT then the market value of the rights at the time of exercise must be added to the cost base of the new shares too.
Company issued rights or options bought from someone else (i.e. not issued direct from the company) are treated like options above.
When a mutual society such as an insurance company demutualizes by converting memberships to shareholdings, the company advises members of a cost base and reduced cost base for their new shares. That cost base represents "embedded value". The ATO publishes cost bases for significant recent demutualizations, such as AMP Limited and Insurance Australia Group. When shares are later sold a capital gain or loss occurs in the usual way.
When a company is being wound up or goes into administration, the liquidator, receiver or administrator may make a formal declaration that they expect no residual distribution to shareholders (all money being exhausted paying creditors first). Shareholders may then, if they wish, claim a capital loss on the shares as if they disposed of them for nil consideration. If a subsequent liquidation distribution does occur then it's treated as a capital gain.
Liquidators were granted the power to make such declarations from 11 November 1991, and other insolvency practitioners from 11 May 1991. Of course a shareholder may always sell apparently worthless shares to a third party for a nominal sum to realize a loss.
Short selling is covered under ordinary income tax, not capital gains tax. The reason for this is that in the first leg, i.e. the sale, the investor is not disposing of an asset they own.
When deductions are claimed for depreciation of an asset, and it's later sold, there a balancing adjustment to be made for the proceeds versus the written-down value. In the usual case that the proceeds are less than the original cost, then any difference between proceeds and written-down value is income or further deduction and CGT does not apply.
If however, the proceeds are greater than the original cost, then the amount between the written-down value and the original cost is income, and the proceeds above that are a capital gain. Effectively deductions allowed in past years are reversed then the usual CGT applies.
A person for whom buying and selling shares or other assets is a business treats those assets as trading stock, and gains or losses on them are ordinary income rather than capital gains. The taxpayer needs to determine whether they fall into the category of a share trader or not.
There's no specific law on share traders, but the ATO publishes a fact sheet with guidelines based on court rulings [1]. It includes examples of definitely trading, and definitely not. Factors include whether the intention is to profit, the repetition and regularity of the activity, and whether organised in a businesslike manner. (At worst a taxpayer can use the system of private rulings to get an ATO determination on particular circumstances they're in or are contemplating.)
A trader has the advantage that losses can be offset against other income (dividends for instance), and has a choice of valuing each share at either cost price or market price each year, so unrealized losses can be booked immediately but unrealized gains held back. The disadvantage for a trader is that the 50% discount on CGT gains for assets held 1 year or more is not available.
Prior to the introduction of capital gains tax in 1985, section 52 of the ITAA 1936 required taxpayers to declare (on their next return) assets they had acquired for trading. This was known as declaring oneself a share trader, but now there's no such election.
The following sections are various special provisions for deferring capital gains tax liability, either by letting a new owner keep the previous owner's cost base, or by letting an owner switch to a new similar asset and keep the old cost base.
On death, CGT assets transferred to beneficiaries (either directly or first to an executor) are not treated as disposed of by the deceased, but instead the beneficiaries are taken to have acquired them at the deceased's date of death and with cost base and reduced cost base as at that date.
This rollover doesn't apply if the beneficiary is not an Australian resident, or is a tax-advantaged entity such as a superannuation fund. In such cases the deceased is taken to have sold to the beneficiary at market value at the date of death, and the usual capital gains tax applies. Churches and charities are regarded as tax-advantaged too, but bequests to registered "Deductible Gift Recipients" are not taxed. Gifts under the Cultural Bequests Program are not subject to tax either.
Also, this rollover doesn't apply to pre-CGT assets (i.e. acquired by the deceased before 20 September 1985), in that case assets are taken to be disposed of at market value to the beneficiary, at the deceased's date of death. Being pre-CGT, there's no capital gains tax to the estate, but the pre-CGT status of the asset is lost.
Notice that for both pre and post CGT assets there are no tax liabilities to the deceased's estate for the usual case of transferring to an individual Australian beneficiary. This means in the majority of cases capital gains tax doesn't operate as a proxy for death duties or estate tax.
Unused net capital losses carried forward by the deceased from past tax years are lost with their death. These losses cannot be recouped by the estate or the beneficiaries (TD 95/47).
When assets are transferred between spouses under a court approved settlement following marriage breakdown, certain rollover provisions automatically apply. Essentially the spouse receiving the asset keeps the original cost base and acquisition date. Newly created intanglible assets like rights or options have a cost base of only what was actually spent in creating them (solicitor's fees for instance).
Transfers not made under court approval are not subject to rollover, the normal CGT rules apply to any disposals. And if assets are not transferred at market value and not in an "arms length" transaction then for CGT purposes the transfer will be treated as having been made at market value.
"Scrip for scrip" rollover may be available for a takeover or merger where a shareholder receives new shares or new trust units rather than cash. When rollover is available the new shareholding is treated as a continuation of the old, with the same cost base and date of acquisition. Scrip for scrip rollover is available when,
The shareholder can elect not to utilize scrip for scrip rollover, and instead treat it as a disposal of their original holding for the value of the new shares, realizing a capital gain. Or the shareholder can choose rollover on just a portion of their holding.
Under Australian companies law, if a bidder gains 90% acceptance it may force remaining holders to take the bid. Such holders are in the same position as those who voluntarily accepted (in particular note that the "compulsory acquisition" rollover below doesn't apply).
When a company spins off part of its business as a new separate company and gives shareholders new shares in that new company, the taxpayer's cost base of the original shares is split between the original and the new holding. The company advises the appropriate proportions and the new holding is taken to be acquired at the date of demerger.
In certain eligible demergers rollover relief may be available, the company will generally advise of that. If available and if the taxpayer elects to use it, the new holding is taken to have been acquired at the same date as the original holding, and that includes being pre-CGT if the original was pre-CGT.
Usually rollover relief (when available) is an advantage, it preserves pre-CGT status and helps an individual meet the 1 year time period for the 50% discount on gains. However, on pre-CGT assets where the market value of the new holding is below its cost base, the taxpayer is better off not using the rollover but instead let the new holding be a CGT asset so the capital loss there can be utilized.
When an asset is compusorily acquired by a government agency, or is destroyed and insurance or compensation is received, the taxpayer may choose between,
When rolling-over there are rules to use when the compensation differs from the replacement or repair cost. And in particular there's a limit of 120% of market value if replacing a pre-CGT asset (so it's not possible to get a substantially bigger asset into pre-CGT status).
Note that these provisions apply only to capital assets, not to trading stock, nor to plant being depreciated.
Changes have been made by ATO to relax some of the provisions listed below. Check ATO Website for further details.
Four capital gains tax concessions for small businesses presently exist, introduced 21 September 1999.
There are rules to apply for what constitutes a small business. The key elements are,
The exemption for gains paid into a superannuation fund is similar to what employees may do with an eligible termination payment (accumulated unused long service leave etc.) on leaving a job. But the small business case it's only the net gain after applying the CGT discounts which needs to be paid into the fund to escape CGT liability, the remainder can be kept in cash.